Regardless 
    of how many studies prove the importance of search engine marketing, the 
    real question is whether it is cost effective and if so, how do you apply it 
    to your Web site?
    Most search 
    engine users do not scroll past the first few pages of search engine 
    results. A site must appear near the top to be found. If you'd like to learn 
    more about how your business can profit using 
    
    WebPosition Gold
    Download a 
    free trial version of 
    
    WebPosition Gold now!
    
    
    Find Out Who Has Surpassed Google in Size
    
    
    Fast, the Norwegian based company 
    that powers AllTheWeb and Lycos, announced that they have now indexed a 
    record setting 2.1 billion pages across the Web. This number, if accurate, 
    would edge out Google's claim of 2,073,418,204 pages indexed as of this 
    writing. Up until now, no one has been able to challenge Google in terms of 
    index size. 
    Although 
    that gives Fast a bit of a lead, it may not be one that is likely to last 
    long. I've heard reports that Google has been spidering the Web at a brisker 
    pace lately. Web sites with higher link popularities and Google "PageRank" 
    are indexed weekly and sometimes daily. Less popular sites may still have to 
    wait 30 days though, with indexing most often taking place during the last 
    week of the month. 
    Even though 
    Google may be trying to improve the "freshness" of its content, Fast claims 
    to have the edge on Google in this department as well. According to the Fast 
    press release, they complete a "full refresh cycle" every 7-11 days. Fast 
    took away another Google exclusive recently by supporting the indexing of 
    PDF files last May. 
    It's 
    thought that the timing of Fast's announcement is no coincidence with Fast 
    and Google competing for Yahoo's favor regarding who will serve Yahoo's 
    non-directory "Web Page results" in the future. Google's contract with Yahoo 
    is thought to be expiring soon. 
    
    Are You Losing Visibility by Duplicating Titles?
    I can not 
    stress enough the importance of title tags to the ranking of your Web pages. 
    Few other elements on your page will influence your rankings like the title 
    tag. Therefore, I would like to provide a couple of tips regarding titles 
    that I did not mention in last month's article. 
    
    Many people 
    prefer to do business with someone in their hometown. Therefore, they may 
    search for something like "San Diego Web site design service" rather than 
    just "Web site design service." If the only place you mention that you're 
    based in San Diego is on your contact page, then a search engine is not 
    likely to match that up with the major keywords that appear on the other 
    pages of your site. 
    Despite a 
    desire by search engines to look for "themes" in a Web site, rankings are 
    still assigned primarily based on the content and incoming links for each 
    individual page.
    
    Paid Ad Disclosure Recommended by FTC
    Last year 
    Ralph Nader's consumer watchdog group filed suit against many of the search 
    engines regarding deceptive advertising practices. The complaint was that 
    many search engines fail to clearly label search results that were paid for 
    by an advertiser versus those that were not. For example, some engines call 
    the pay-per-click ads near the top of the search results "Featured Listings" 
    rather than something more clear such as "Paid Listings" or "Sponsored 
    Listings."
    After a 
    year, the case has finally made its way through the system. The verdict? The 
    US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has sent a letter of "recommendation" to 
    the major search engines to more clearly label and explain which search 
    results are paid and which are not. The letter gives suggestions for 
    accomplishing this, but it does not mandate any specific action be taken.
    
    The FTC 
    also stopped short of recommending that any fines be levied against the 
    engines, or to cite any laws as being broken. However, the FTC did say "We 
    wanted to raise a concern that we hope they will take seriously. What we saw 
    across the search engines were some pretty clear disclosures and some that 
    weren't."
    
    Further Shockwaves at LookSmart: Directors and CEO Resign
    
    After 
    LookSmart's controversial and widely criticized switch to a pay-per-click 
    pricing model, more bad news has fallen upon the beleaguered engine. Most 
    notably, Evan Thornley has announced plans to step down as LookSmart's CEO 
    on October 1st. 
    In addition 
    to the CEO's resignation, "irreconcilable differences" on the company's 
    board, according to Thornley, has lead to the resignation of three LookSmart 
    board members effective immediately. According to the San Francisco 
    Chronicle, Thornley said the board had been divided over both the company 
    strategy and his refusal to step down as chairman after his October 1st 
    resignation as CEO. Not surprisingly, LookSmart's stock took a tumble after 
    the June 25th announcement to $1.58 a share, a stark contrast to its high of 
    $72 a share in March 2000.
    The one 
    thing that keeps LookSmart afloat is its agreement with MSN, arguably the 
    most popular search site on the Web, alongside Yahoo. There's little doubt 
    in my mind that Microsoft must be re-thinking its relationship in regard to 
    LookSmart right now. LookSmart's reputation was damaged during their 
    unpopular move to a PPC pricing model a few months ago. The resignation of 
    key members of their senior staff will not help, nor will its potential 
    financial problems resulting from its stock price drop. 
    In 
    addition, if Microsoft wants to comply with the FTC's recent recommendations 
    (still a big IF), they will need to either drop LookSmart, or start labeling 
    their LookSmart listings more clearly. Right now LookSmart results are 
    labeled as "Web Directory Sites." LookSmart's new pricing model and how that 
    affects relevancy may be rather difficult to properly disclose to the 
    average consumer in a handful of words. 
    If the 
    public begins to perceive MSN as an engine that is weighed too heavily 
    toward commercial listings, Microsoft risks a backlash in terms of search 
    credibility. The question is whether Microsoft will regard this credibility 
    threat as being more important than the revenues it receives from LookSmart.
    
    "Exodus 
    follows major shakeup of LookSmart leadership"
    
    
    San Francisco Chronicle, June 25, 2002
    
    Advertise in MarketPosition and Reach Over 470,000 
    People
    If you're 
    interested in advertising in MarketPosition(tm), the most popular search 
    engine marketing newsletter in the world e-mail 
    
    jim@firstplacesoftware.com 
    for current competitive rates and information, or call 1-800-962-4855 x707 
    or see: 
    
    
    http://www.marketposition.com/advertising.htm
    
    Webmasters, 
    marketers, and business owners around the globe read this high quality 
    newsletter and depend on its advice for promoting their businesses online. 
    Whereas many low quality newsletters tend to get deleted as soon as they 
    arrive in a person's inbox, MarketPosition subscribers look forward to 
    reading the in-depth and invaluable content offered each month. 
    
    Last Month:
    Last month 
    we talked about several important topics including: